Journal of Law & Public Policy Vol-3 (2016)
- Journal of Law and Public Policy Journals
- May 7, 2019
- 1597
About the Journal
The Journal of Law and Public Policy, a peer reviewed journal first released in 2014 is published annually by the Centre for Environment Law Education, Research and Advocacy. It touches upon various socio-legal issues in the interface between law and public policy such as human rights, consumer welfare, women rights, socio-economic rights, food security law, access to legal aid, medical law and ethics to name a few. The fourth, fifth and sixth volumes of the Journal have specially dealt with legal and policy issues on the Uniform Civil Code, Sustainable Energy and Sports. In addition to scholarly articles the Journal has also featured case comments and book reviews. JLPP is a peer reviewed journal with an ISSN No. 2350-1200.
Role of Delegated Legislation in Implementing the
National Food Security Act 2013: e Karnataka Experience
Dr. Neetu Sharma & Ms. Neenu Suresh
The authors in the
article argues that ‘Rulemaking’, in many cases, provides an opportunity to
plug lacunae left by the parent law and in many others the impact of the parent
law can be potentially amplified. While framing aspects the rules under
National Food Security Act, 2013 is challenging for States upon whom the major
task of implementation rests, it also opens up opportunities to further Food
Security. However, the current trend in rule-making is a matter of grave
concern, not only because the process has not gathered momentum but also
because in many of the states rather than augmenting the Act, state governments
are using this as an opportunity to dilute the existing benefits. Centre for
Child and the Law (CCL), National Law School of India University (NLSIU),
Bengaluru, got civil society, academics and grassroots functionaries involved
in the process to draft state rules for Karnataka. The Centre used this as an
opportunity to ensure coordination among the roles of various State Departments
as envisaged in the Act and the same has also got reflected in the Draft
Karnataka State Rules. It is an opportune moment to share some of the insights
as well as challenges from the Karnataka process, when most of the states are
once again at the threshold of another extended deadline for implementation of
the Act. The authors discuss the effect of delegated legislations in the main
context of National Food Security Act, 2013 and make a critical analysis of the
role of different governments in such respect.
Access to Quality Legal Aid Services Provided by e
Legal Aid Counsels in Delhi: A Critical Scrutiny
Dr. J. S. Mann
The author in this
article states that there is no dearth of Statutory Enactments on Right to Free
Legal Aid in India. Legal Aid system is not functioning effectively and not
catering the requirements of the beneficiaries. Legal Aid Services provided by
the empanelled Legal Practitioners are free of charges but people in majority
are reluctant to approach free legal aid authorities for availing such
services. The Legal Aid System, even after spending huge resources, has not
been able to achieve the objectives for which the system of Legal Aid has been
created, in India. The given research paper has examined two prominent
components in the form of Competency and Commitments of Legal Aid Counsels and
their impact on the quality of Legal Aid services before various Courts in 11
Districts and High Court of Delhi.
Patent Standardization and Implications on Competition
in Mobile Telecommunications Market
Dr. Sandeep S. Desai
& Aditya Mitra
In a spate of
Litigations initiated by Ericson on Companies like Intex, Micromax and more
recently Xiomi the issue of patent infringement with respect to the use of 2G
and 3G technology in mobile communication has become major issue in both
competition law as well as intellectual property rights. The major area of
convergence between the two subject areas comes with the introduction of
Standard Essential Patents (SEP). These SEP’s are part of a step that aims at
standardizing technology which is essential in nature and concomitantly ensures
that patent rights do not become a major hindrance to innovation, efficiency
and technological development. Conversely however it can be argued that the
extension of patent protection to standardized technology is a monopolistic
move which allows major players to capitalize on the requirement of these basic
technologies by emerging or relatively smaller players in the same market. Very
few cases on the matter have been decided till date, fewer so in India. The matter
becomes highly contextual considering the overwhelming notions of good market
functioning and economy or industry as well as notions of fairness regarding
the same which become the metrics to decide these matters. Such matters
therefore include two categories of stake holders; the major players, who are
dominant in the market and the upcoming and smaller players in the emerging
market. An essential issue that must also be dealt with in conjunction, when
analyzing the situation of these stakeholders is the delineation of the
relevant market in which the conflict arises. From the perspective of the
emerging players it is seen as a case of monopolistic abuse by major players,
considering that these Patents are standard and are therefore an absolute
necessity in any form of production. From the perspective of the major firms
the SEP’s are a product of major investments in research and development, thus
from their vantage point the dominant firms, if they cannot enforce their
patent rights then the investment made by them amounts to nothing. The paper is
a major study on the understanding of such companies and their workings and
their relation to Competition Law.
Effects of Dynamic Pricing on Consumer Protection – A
Review
S. Balasubramanya
In today’s
changing environment world over, pricing of products and services are going
through continuous innovation across various sectors. What was once a paid
service or a product is no longer necessary to own that product to avail the
same service. Many products and services are charged to customer entirely on
variable models across different industries. As time and money become extremely
interchangeable, providers of these products and services continuously and
newer ways to price their products and services which will provide them with
higher benefits and profits. Under the above changing scenario, while one may
very well appreciate and argue that the cost of these products and services
have come down, it is the Consumer who is the recipient of these products and
services and protected by law to ensure against exploitation. The paper
critically assesses the effects of such dynamic pricing models on consumer
protection. Dynamic pricing could be the variation in price charged to customer
based on point of sale as also time of usage of a product or service. However,
it may be noted that there is no change in the cost of production of such
products or services to the manufacturer. If that is so, is it justified to
charge differential pricing of the same product or service to the consumer?
Does it not affect consumer protection against unfair trade practices or unfair
pricing?
Medico-Legal and Ethical Issues in Living Donor Organ
Transplantation
Dr. Sanjay Rao
The author having
a practitioner’s view of the topic states in his paper that Organ
transplantation is the only lifesaving treatment for patients with organ
failure. Kidneys and livers are the commonest organs transplanted. Cadaveric
donors provide organs for transplantation. Improving success with
transplantation has resulted in increasing number of patients opting for this
therapy, resulting in a severe shortage of donor organs. Living donor
transplantation has become a major alternative source of organs. Live donor
transplants are carried out from organs donated by healthy adults. The Transplantation of Human Organs Act
mandates that organ donors be first degree relatives or those “emotionally
related” to the prospective recipient. Donation for consideration is illegal.
Similar laws exist in most countries. However, living donor organ transplantation
is controversial. The continued shortage of donor organs has resulted in a
nourishing black market. Organ trade, trafficking and tourism have resulted in
exploitation of poor organ sellers. Though unrelated and commercial organ
donations bear the promise of sharply increasing organs supply, controversies
remain. Hence, the paper critically discusses the Legal, Ethical and Moral
challenges in this complex area of live donor organ transplantation. He also
attempts to evolve a just system that protects the needs of all stakeholders.
Driving Innovation for Neglected Diseases: A Policy
Perspective
Rhyea Malik
The author argues
that ‘Patent’ was established to drive innovation in all aspects of life, but
today the system of patents has failed to promote uniformity in innovation,
especially in the case of neglected diseases. Marred with monopolistic prices,
supernormal profits, evergreening and duplication and wastage of resources, the
existing system of patents has in effect legitimized the profiteering
activities of drug companies. As there is a disturbing uneasiness in the very
idea of drug companies profiteering from the sale of what are in effect
indispensible means of health, there is an urgent need to take stock of the
defects of the existing system and to come up with an improved system for
incentivizing innovation. One mode for achieving the same is by devising new
policy solutions in alignment with a more development driven agenda. However,
the article has limited to exploring few such policy solutions for driving drug
development for neglected diseases.
Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act and Contrary
Scientific Evidence
Akshat Agarwal
The Supreme Court
in the recent case of Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik v. Lata Nandlal Badwaik held that
proof based on scientific advancement, which is accepted by the world community
to be correct, will override conclusive proof envisaged under section 112 of
the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In this paper, the author argues that this
approach is problematic since it contravenes the express statutory prohibition
of adducing evidence against the presumption of legitimacy except in the
instances laid down in the provision. However, this approach of the court is
not sudden but is in line with a balance that the judiciary has been attempting
to strike in its jurisprudence on section 112. While on one hand the question
is whether the policy is rationale and on the other is the lure of the
objective, scientific truth which the court considers its bounden duty to
observe. The development of science has thus raised complex questions before
the court which has forced it to make a choice amongst competing considerations.
Notwithstanding the merit of these considerations the choice itself has
resulted in judicial confusion thereby making the circumstances ripe for
legislative intervention.
The Armed Forces Special Powers Act: The Way Forward
Aditi Sinha
& Salona Mittal
The Armed Forces
Special Powers Act, 1958, one of the smallest acts in the country with only
seven sections has been at the helm of public debate, nationally and
internationally. The authors analyse the circumstances in which the Act was promulgated,
the controversial provisions of the Act, the judicial stance on its
constitutional validity and whether only the Army is at fault. in this regard,
the paper takes into account alleged cases of human rights violations in one
hand and on the other it attempts to present the Army’s perspective on the
same. Should the Act be done away with solely based on the fact that the Army
has been given extensive powers or is there a way forward? The following paper
attempts to study the various aspects of this controversial act and arrive at
an impartial and feasible denouncement.
The Enemy Property Ordinance, 2016: Examining the
Constitutionality of the Legacy of the Partition
Praharsh Johorey
The President
promulgated an Ordinance on the 7th of January, 2016 called the Enemy Property
(Amendment and Validation) Ordinance, 2016; that allowed the Government of
India to seize control of, and alienate all property that belonged to ‘Enemies’
of the Country, even if their legal heirs were law-abiding Citizens of India.
The given paper seeks to examine the unpredictable and oppressive law
pertaining to Enemy Property in India, in the context of the Ordinance making
power granted to the Executive under the Constitution as well as the power of
the Legislature to invalidate Judicial Decisions retrospectively; all of which
pose crucial legal questions to the Supreme Court in the inevitable challenges
to the Ordinance.
The Need, the Greed and the Media : Regulating the
Unregulated
Abhishek Patil & Bhagirath Ashiya
In a society where
millions elect a handful of representatives to make the right choices, the
media has impeded the state’s path towards heights of arbitrariness, as it not
only vents public opinion but acts as a formidable pressure group against the
actions of the State. The Indian media, which played an active role in the
freedom struggle, today inherits a slightly different role of disclosing the
laws of the State. The traditions of Pluralism and Divergent Opinion are
muddled under rising Regionalism, Ideological divides, Corporatization and
Sensationalism rather than Sensitization. On these lines placing media as a
fourth pillar has a partial accomplishment, as the media in India is highly
credited for highlighting problems but has failed in solving one. Further a
question arises on its credibility in the light of allegations of paid-news and
unnecessary hype creating unrest beyond boundaries. The development of a
representative democracy can be expressed as a part of the democratic learning
curves that the masses face, as electoral education and public knowledge is one
of the essential facets in exercising the right to vote. The need for
regulation of broadcast media is one of the long standing issues which require
an elaborate discussion considering the balance between freedom of press and
national interests affected by the unregulated media. The paper deals with the
question of the need for requisite checks and balances over the Media and the
resultant impact on democratic principles and constitutional ideals with media
as a fourth estate.
India – Certain Measures Relating to Solar Cells and
Solar Modules (WT/DS/456)
Dr. Kavitha Chalakkal
The author makes a
critical analysis of the case on Measures Relating to Solar Cells and Solar
Molecules and states that the decision of the WTO DSB Panel in the
India-Certain Measures to Solar Cells and Solar Molecules is concerned with
certain Policies of the Government of India with regard to the Implementation
of its Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission. The United States argued
these measures were hampering International trade and was nullifying and
impairing its Trade Benefits. The Panel after deliberations stated that the
Indian DCR Measures expressly stipulate the origin of specified goods that may
be used by SPD’s for bidding eligibility and participation under each of the
relevant batches of the Mission and can be considered as a Trade Measure. The
panel found that the Indian Measures were inconsistent with its International
Trade Obligations, especially those under GATT 1994 and TRIMS. hence, the
following paper focuses on the relevance of the rising needs of developing
countries for increased use of renewable resources for energy and also the
recent efforts taken by India to boost its domestic economy.
An Analysis of the US Supreme Court Judgment,
‘Association Molecular Pathology, et al. v. Myriad Genetics Inc., et al’
Siddhanth Tripathi & Tanya Chaudhry
The paper is a
comment on the case related to on the US Supreme Court Judgement in the
Association Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics’. The authors in their paper
state that the parties disputed the scope of what may be patented under 35
U.S.C. §101. The Association for Molecular Pathology (“AMP”) argued that the
form and function of isolated DNA is the same as that in nature, thus is not
patentable. Myriad countered that the patent claims fall with the plain
language of §101 and that the patents are for inventions-thus patentable.
Since, this case has garnered significant interest in the IP community as the
case has clarified the bounds of patentable subject-matter; it needs to be
analyzed to determine its impact upon the Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology
industries and other communities. The authors seek to scrutinize the broad
aspects which determine the patentability of a subject matter with special
reference to the man-made DNA structure as biotechnological inventions and the
impact of the holding of Supreme Court on the future R&D endeavors in
relation to Human DNA. Finally, the authors analyse the various uncertainties
which were left unanswered by Supreme Court in the light of earlier Judgments
of Supreme Court of USA.